1982 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (229 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1982 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 460 kg more than 1982 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Lincoln LS (298 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2004 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen CX. 2004 Lincoln LS has automatic transmission and 1982 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1982 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Lincoln LS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Citroen CX | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
| Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
| Model | CX | LS |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2967 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 229 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6750 RPM |
| Torque | 159 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 80 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1685 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2780 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 68 L |
