1982 Citroen CX vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1982 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Citroen CX weights approximately 781 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Because 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Westfield XTR 2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen CX | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
Make | Citroen | Westfield |
Model | CX | XTR 2 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 173 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 9800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 444 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |