1982 Citroen CX vs. 2005 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Ford Falcon is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen CX would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Falcon (200 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1982 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Falcon weights approximately 356 kg more than 1982 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2005 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen CX. 2005 Ford Falcon has automatic transmission and 1982 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1982 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Ford Falcon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Citroen CX | 2005 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | CX | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 3984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 200 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque | 159 Nm | 357 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 92.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 99.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1581 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2930 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 70 L |
