1982 Citroen CX vs. 2008 Jaguar XJ6
To start off, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,967 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 (235 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1982 Citroen CX. (105 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 320 kg more than 1982 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jaguar XJ6 (300 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 141 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2008 Jaguar XJ6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen CX. 2008 Jaguar XJ6 has automatic transmission and 1982 Citroen CX has manual transmission. 1982 Citroen CX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Jaguar XJ6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen CX | 2008 Jaguar XJ6 | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | CX | XJ6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 105 HP | 235 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.5 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 233 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1225 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2110 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 85 L |