1982 Citroen GS vs. 2000 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Ford Ranger is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen GS would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Ranger (135 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 1982 Citroen GS. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Ranger weights approximately 373 kg more than 1982 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen GS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Citroen GS | 2000 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | GS | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1128 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 135 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 55 L |
