1982 Citroen GS vs. 2001 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2001 Lincoln LS is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen GS would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lincoln LS (210 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1982 Citroen GS. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lincoln LS weights approximately 762 kg more than 1982 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Lincoln LS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Lincoln LS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen GS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen GS | 2001 Lincoln LS | |
Make | Citroen | Lincoln |
Model | GS | LS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1128 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 68 L |