1982 Citroen GS vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen GS would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1982 Citroen GS. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 791 kg more than 1982 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Citroen GS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen GS | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | GS | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1128 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1716 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 78 L |