1982 Citroen GS vs. 2005 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen GS would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Ranger (86 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Citroen GS. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 350 kg more than 1982 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen GS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Citroen GS | 2005 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | GS | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1128 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 86 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1275 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 80 L |
