1982 Citroen GS vs. 2006 Skoda Roomster
To start off, 2006 Skoda Roomster is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen GS would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Skoda Roomster is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Skoda Roomster (104 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1982 Citroen GS. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Skoda Roomster should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Skoda Roomster weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen GS | 2006 Skoda Roomster | |
Make | Citroen | Skoda |
Model | GS | Roomster |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1128 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 45 L |