1982 Citroen GS vs. 2010 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XJ is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen GS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen GS would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XJ (271 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1982 Citroen GS. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen GS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 871 kg more than 1982 Citroen GS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen GS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen GS | 2010 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | GS | XJ |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1128 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1796 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1895 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3157 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 82 L |