1982 Citroen LN vs. 2005 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2005 Holden Rodeo is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen LN would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1982 Citroen LN. (35 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen LN.
Because 2005 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen LN, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen LN. (50 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2005 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen LN.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Citroen LN | 2005 Holden Rodeo | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | LN | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 652 cc | 2405 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 35 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 50 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 3060 mm |
