1982 Citroen LN vs. 2006 Ford Explorer
To start off, 2006 Ford Explorer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen LN. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen LN would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Explorer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Explorer (292 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 243 more horse power than 1982 Citroen LN. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Explorer should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen LN.
Because 2006 Ford Explorer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Citroen LN. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Explorer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Explorer (407 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 321 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen LN. (86 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Explorer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen LN.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen LN | 2006 Ford Explorer | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | LN | Explorer |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 86 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 85 L |