1982 Citroen Visa vs. 2008 Tata Nano
To start off, 2008 Tata Nano is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen Visa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen Visa would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Citroen Visa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Citroen Visa (80 HP) has 45 more horse power than 2008 Tata Nano. (35 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Citroen Visa should accelerate faster than 2008 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Citroen Visa weights approximately 215 kg more than 2008 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen Visa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Citroen Visa (110 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Citroen Visa will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Citroen Visa | 2008 Tata Nano | |
Make | Citroen | Tata |
Model | Visa | Nano |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 35 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 75 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 815 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3700 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 37 L |