1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na vs. 2006 Ford Fiesta
To start off, 2006 Ford Fiesta is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na would be higher. At 1,594 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Fiesta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Fiesta (100 HP) has 41 more horse power than 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fiesta should accelerate faster than 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na.
Because 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Fiesta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Fiesta (146 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. (100 Nm). This means 2006 Ford Fiesta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na | 2006 Ford Fiesta | |
Make | Daewoo | Ford |
Model | Maepsy-Na | Fiesta |
Year Released | 1982 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1492 cc | 1594 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 100 HP |
Torque | 100 Nm | 146 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2490 mm |