1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na vs. 2009 Audi A6
To start off, 2009 Audi A6 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Audi A6 (230 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na.
Because 2009 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Audi A6 has automatic transmission and 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na has manual transmission. 1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Audi A6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daewoo Maepsy-Na | 2009 Audi A6 | |
Make | Daewoo | Audi |
Model | Maepsy-Na | A6 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1492 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 230 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4270 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1519 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2833 mm |