1982 Daihatsu Delta vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Delta would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Delta. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Delta.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Delta. (147 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Delta | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Holden |
Model | Delta | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 3060 mm |