1982 Daihatsu Delta vs. 2008 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Holden Epica is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Delta would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden Epica (153 HP) has 62 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Delta. (91 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Delta.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Delta is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Daihatsu Delta. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden Epica (237 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Delta. (147 Nm). This means 2008 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Delta | 2008 Holden Epica | |
Make | Daihatsu | Holden |
Model | Delta | Epica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1770 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 91 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2200 mm | 2700 mm |