1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1969 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1982 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Lotus Elan (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 630 kg more than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Lotus Elan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Daihatsu Taft (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Lotus Elan. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Daihatsu Taft will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 1969 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Daihatsu | Lotus |
Model | Taft | Elan |
Year Released | 1982 | 1969 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 1558 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 700 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 3690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2140 mm |