1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1978 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1982 Daihatsu Taft is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda RX-3 (100 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda RX-3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 480 kg more than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1978 Mazda RX-3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Daihatsu Taft (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda RX-3. (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Daihatsu Taft will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda RX-3.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Daihatsu Taft | 1978 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
| Model | Taft | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
| Engine Size | 2764 cc | 1963 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2320 mm |
