1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1984 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1984 Ford Tempo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 225 kg more than 1984 Ford Tempo.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Ford Tempo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1984 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 1984 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Taft | Tempo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1984 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 2306 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2540 mm |