1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 1990 Volvo 780
To start off, 1990 Volvo 780 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 780 (200 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 780 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 780 weights approximately 250 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Volvo 780. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Daihatsu Taft (165 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Volvo 780. (143 Nm). This means 1982 Daihatsu Taft will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Volvo 780.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 1990 Volvo 780 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
Model | Taft | 780 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1990 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 200 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 143 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2780 mm |