1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2000 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2000 Toyota Celica is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Celica weights approximately 215 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Celica (177 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2000 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Daihatsu | Toyota |
Model | Taft | Celica |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 177 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2600 mm |