1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2002 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2002 Jeep Compass is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Jeep Compass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jeep Compass (210 HP) has 142 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Compass should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Compass weights approximately 76 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jeep Compass (319 Nm) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm). This means 2002 Jeep Compass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2002 Jeep Compass | |
Make | Daihatsu | Jeep |
Model | Taft | Compass |
Year Released | 1982 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 210 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 319 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1406 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2660 mm |