1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2004 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Ford Ranger is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 122 kg more than 2004 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Ranger (323 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2004 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
| Model | Taft | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 2764 cc | 4015 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1208 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1730 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3200 mm |
