1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2004 Samsung SM3
To start off, 2004 Samsung SM3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Samsung SM3 (94 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Samsung SM3 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 170 kg more than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Samsung SM3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Daihatsu Taft (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Samsung SM3. (135 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1982 Daihatsu Taft will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Samsung SM3.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2004 Samsung SM3 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Samsung |
Model | Taft | SM3 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 135 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1160 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2540 mm |