1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2005 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2005 MCC Crossblade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 586 kg more than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Daihatsu Taft (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 1982 Daihatsu Taft will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2005 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Daihatsu | MCC |
| Model | Taft | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 2764 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 1810 mm |
