1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 88 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Suzuki Reno. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (171 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Daihatsu | Suzuki |
Model | Taft | Reno |
Year Released | 1982 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 171 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1242 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2610 mm |