1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2009 Lexus LS
To start off, 2009 Lexus LS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Lexus LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lexus LS (358 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 290 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lexus LS should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lexus LS weights approximately 410 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus LS (466 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Lexus LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2009 Lexus LS | |
Make | Daihatsu | Lexus |
Model | Taft | LS |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 358 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 466 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3100 mm |