1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2010 Ford F-350
To start off, 2010 Ford F-350 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-350 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 358 kg more than 2010 Ford F-350.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford F-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-350 (495 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2010 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Daihatsu | Ford |
Model | Taft | F-350 |
Year Released | 1982 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 2764 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 68 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 165 Nm | 495 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 972 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 6260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1960 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3970 mm |