1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2011 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-Z is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 2,764 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Daihatsu Taft is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-Z (122 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (68 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-Z should accelerate faster than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 128 kg more than 2011 Honda CR-Z.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Honda CR-Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-Z (173 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2011 Honda CR-Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2011 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Honda |
| Model | Taft | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Size | 2764 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 122 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1202 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2436 mm |
