1982 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 121 kg more than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Because 1982 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2011 Volvo C30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 185 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Daihatsu Taft. (165 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Daihatsu Taft | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Volvo |
| Model | Taft | C30 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2011 |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 68 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1330 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2639 mm |
