1982 De Tomaso Deauville vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1982 De Tomaso Deauville is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 De Tomaso Deauville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 De Tomaso Deauville (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1974 Volvo 140. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 De Tomaso Deauville should accelerate faster than 1974 Volvo 140.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 De Tomaso Deauville (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Volvo 140. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 De Tomaso Deauville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Volvo 140.
Compare all specifications:
1982 De Tomaso Deauville | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Volvo |
Model | Deauville | 140 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4890 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2620 mm |