1982 De Tomaso Deauville vs. 2009 Ford Flex
To start off, 2009 Ford Flex is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 De Tomaso Deauville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 De Tomaso Deauville would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 De Tomaso Deauville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 De Tomaso Deauville (297 HP) has 41 more horse power than 2009 Ford Flex. (256 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1982 De Tomaso Deauville should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Flex.
Because 1982 De Tomaso Deauville is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 De Tomaso Deauville. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Flex, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 De Tomaso Deauville (450 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Flex. (245 Nm). This means 1982 De Tomaso Deauville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Flex.
Compare all specifications:
1982 De Tomaso Deauville | 2009 Ford Flex | |
Make | De Tomaso | Ford |
Model | Deauville | Flex |
Year Released | 1982 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 450 Nm | 245 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1930 mm |