1982 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1949 Triumph Renown
To start off, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Triumph Renown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Triumph Renown would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1949 Triumph Renown. (67 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1949 Triumph Renown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 424 kg more than 1949 Triumph Renown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1949 Triumph Renown. (148 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1949 Triumph Renown.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1949 Triumph Renown | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Triumph |
| Model | Longchamp | Renown |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5763 cc | 2088 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 92 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 1280 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1610 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2750 mm |
