1982 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1977 Volvo 66
To start off, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 1977 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1977 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 356 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Volvo 66. (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
1982 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1977 Volvo 66 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Volvo |
Model | Longchamp | 66 |
Year Released | 1982 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 73.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |