1982 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1996 Renault 19
To start off, 1996 Renault 19 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1996 Renault 19. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1996 Renault 19. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 555 kg more than 1996 Renault 19. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (450 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Renault 19. (150 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Renault 19.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1996 Renault 19 | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Renault |
| Model | Longchamp | 19 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 82.7 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 83.5 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2550 mm |
