1982 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 2000 Holden GTS-R
To start off, 2000 Holden GTS-R is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden GTS-R, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden GTS-R (644 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. (450 Nm). This means 2000 Holden GTS-R will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp has automatic transmission and 2000 Holden GTS-R has manual transmission. 2000 Holden GTS-R will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp | 2000 Holden GTS-R | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Holden |
| Model | Longchamp | GTS-R |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5763 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 644 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
