1982 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-350. (255 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 784 kg more than 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp. (450 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 De Tomaso Longchamp | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | De Tomaso | Ford |
| Model | Longchamp | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5763 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 296 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 450 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 106 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1704 kg | 2488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 3510 mm |
