1982 Dodge 600 vs. 1978 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1982 Dodge 600 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1978 Ford Mustang. (87 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 1978 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1978 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1978 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Ford Mustang. (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Ford Mustang.

Compare all specifications: