1982 Dodge 600 vs. 1978 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 1982 Dodge 600 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Volkswagen Polo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Volkswagen Polo would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. (49 HP @ 5900 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 505 kg more than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Volkswagen Polo. (77 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 1978 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | 600 | Polo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 77 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2340 mm |