1982 Dodge 600 vs. 1979 Seat 131
To start off, 1982 Dodge 600 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Seat 131. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Seat 131 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1979 Seat 131. (71 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 1979 Seat 131.
Because 1979 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Seat 131. (149 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Seat 131.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 1979 Seat 131 | |
| Make | Dodge | Seat |
| Model | 600 | 131 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 2445 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 149 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1190 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2500 mm |
