1982 Dodge 600 vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 1982 Dodge 600 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Volvo 164 (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1979 Volvo 164 should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 1979 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 164 (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1979 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
| Make | Dodge | Volvo |
| Model | 600 | 164 |
| Year Released | 1982 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 138 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 158 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3350 mm |
