1982 Dodge 600 vs. 1980 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Dodge 600 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 1980 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1980 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Seat Ritmo. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 1980 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Dodge | Seat |
Model | 600 | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1982 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1714 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2460 mm |