1982 Dodge 600 vs. 1999 Acura RL
To start off, 1999 Acura RL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 3,472 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Acura RL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura RL (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura RL should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura RL weights approximately 485 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Acura RL (304 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 125 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Acura RL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 1999 Acura RL | |
Make | Dodge | Acura |
Model | 600 | RL |
Year Released | 1982 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 3472 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 205 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 304 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1675 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2920 mm |