1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2000 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2000 Mercury Cougar is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Cougar (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 120 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mercury Cougar. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mercury Cougar.

Compare all specifications:

1982 Dodge 600 2000 Mercury Cougar
Make Dodge Mercury
Model 600 Cougar
Year Released 1982 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2555 cc 1983 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 93 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 179 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 1190 kg 1310 kg
Vehicle Length 4760 mm 4710 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1330 mm
Wheelbase Size 2630 mm 2710 mm