1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2000 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2000 Mercury Sable is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercury Sable (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mercury Sable weights approximately 345 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercury Sable (251 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2000 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Dodge | Mercury |
Model | 600 | Sable |
Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2760 mm |