1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Arosa (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 99 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1982 Dodge 600 | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Dodge | Seat |
| Model | 600 | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1982 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 117 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 1289 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2850 mm |
