1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Dodge 600 (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart weights approximately 310 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart (185 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm). This means 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart | |
Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 600 | Smart |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 1689 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 185 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1475 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2720 mm |