1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2001 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2001 Smart ForFour is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Smart ForFour (94 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (93 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Smart ForFour should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Dodge 600 weights approximately 220 kg more than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Dodge 600 (179 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Smart ForFour. (125 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2001 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Dodge | Smart |
Model | 600 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1982 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2555 cc | 1332 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 125 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |