1982 Dodge 600 vs. 2003 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2003 Honda CR-V is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Honda CR-V (160 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1982 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1982 Dodge 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Honda CR-V weights approximately 353 kg more than 1982 Dodge 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Dodge 600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Honda CR-V (220 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Dodge 600. (158 Nm). This means 2003 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Dodge 600.
Compare all specifications:
1982 Dodge 600 | 2003 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Dodge | Honda |
Model | 600 | CR-V |
Year Released | 1982 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2212 cc | 2360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 220 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1165 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2630 mm |